« Reunited with Paula, Lisa and Fat Angus | Main | Time really does fly »

Thursday, February 03, 2005

I'm a mactard

I came across a webpage so shockingly stupid, I wasn't sure whether is was a parody or just an inaccurate review. Parts of it were outright parody and others were echoing comments I'd read elsewhere around the 'net. Regardless, I had to comment on it. I like Macs, I use Macs daily and they suit me fine. I don't consider myself a Jobs worshipper and I don't watch the Mac expo web streams hanging on his every word. I'm, in that regard, fairly normal.

I present: Mac Mini - The emporer's new computer by Jorge Lopez.

Ok, here we go.

Both the Apple hype machine and Jobs' reality distortion field have kicked into overdrive this year with the recent release of the bold, innovative and affordable G4 Cube...oops I mean the Mac mini.

All right, you get that one. I too though "G4 Cube" when I heard of the Mac Mini.

While the hardware is about roughly equivalent to a Windows PC circa 1995...

The cheapest Mac Mini comes with a 1.25GHz G4 processor and 256mb RAM. Now, it's no powerhouse - especially when you're used to 3.6ghz figures, but does it compare to a Wintel specificiation from 10 years ago? I'm not really going to spend valuable seconds looking up the spec of a '95 computer, but I'm guessing we're talking Pentium 1 at about 500mhz. I get that he's probably being sarcastic and it's probably a parody, but this is paragraph two which sets you up for the rest knowing that he's not going to give it a fair review.

Oh, did I forget to mention that the Mini has no PCI slots either?  And no floppy disk drive?  Well, no wonder they got the unit to be so small.  No keyboard or mouse either.

The Mac Mini is marketed at people who think a PCI slot is some kind of ornate letterbox. Macs got rid of the floppy drive years ago with the original blueberry iMac and we've got along just fine without floppy disks.

I could get a Mac mini computer for $499 and have no keyboard or mouse, no serial ports, no way to connect a printer, no PS/2 ports, no floppy drive, no 5.25" bays, no PCI slots, no speakers, and no Windows XP.

No PS/2 ports? Why would you want ancient technology when you have USB ports? No way to connect a printer? We're back to USB ports. I can't think of a single decent printer manufactured in the last 3 years that doesn't offer USB connectivity. Get rid of that '93 laserwriter you cheapskate. No floppy drive - covered that. No PCI slots - don't care. No Windows XP? Well - erm - some might consider that a good thing. Sounding more like a parody.

The Mini boots up into a stripped-down operating system which Apple calls OS X, similar to the stripped-down WindowsCE OS found on many handhelds.  The mini OS is going to be a significant hurdle for many buyers who are used to Windows or have favorite Windows software packages they need to use.  Think of it more as a first computer for your daughter or niece than as a machine to get any serious work done and you’ll get the point of the Mini and its target market. It might also be the perfect computer for grandmothers or autistic children, for example.

A stripped down OS like WindowsCE? A stripped down OS? A unix backbone with some original and innovative features (expose, hello!) is stripped down? That's where you start to lose any last remaining hope that this is going to be a serious review.  That's like saying Unix isn't a capable OS. That'll get loads of bearded weirdos posting on alt.unix.doesnt.suck. Autistic children? Ouch!

The Mini has got some built-in software for basic computer functions, but it can’t do many common things as well as its grown-up brothers in the Windows world can.

Hilarious!

For example, there is no Outlook Express for email, but Apple includes a program called Mail, which is like a stripped-down email client that can’t execute scripts or open attachments without user intervention.

Mail is a stripped down email client? Compared to what? Hal 900? I'm beginnging to realise that this reviewer is confusing "nice, clean UI" to "stripped down and featureless". It can't execute scripts and open attachments without user intervention? THANK GOD!

Secondly and possibly even more glaringly, there is no antivirus program shipped with the Mac.  In today’s climate of non-stop worms, trojans and viruses, releasing a computer with no virus removal software is irresponsible on the part of Apple.  The OS X comes with some system maintenance utilities, but essentials such as a defragmenter or a or registry cleaner are notably absent.  I would expect a Mini to get really slow and unstable within a couple months if you can’t perform any routine maintenance tasks on it.

OS X doesn't need industrial strength anti-virus software because of a distinct lack of viruses for the OS! Yes, Macs aren't mainstream and so hackers aren't interested. That's a well known Mac-fact. A registry cleaner? This isn't Windows you know. We don't need no stinkin' registry to clean!

I did a google to see if there were Mac versions of any of my favorite applications; unfortunately I ended up disappointed every time. There are very few first-person shooters for OSX.  There is no Mac version of WeatherBug to check the temperature anywhere in the world.

Wow. How on earth am I going to live without the knowing how warm it is in Spain? I know, I'll google it! Or better, download one of the gazillion such programs for the Mac. Oh, and my PS 2 disks don't play in my xbox - what's that about?

My Office 2003 CD would not install, despite claims I had heard from Mac fanboys that OS X is compatible with Office.  Heck, the Internet Explorer icon isn’t even out on the taskbar by default, it’s buried in the c:\applications folder. 

Well kiddo, sorry to be the one to break this to you - but you'll need to purchase the Mac version of Office. It's called Office X. It works pretty well. Oh, and there is no C drive in OS X.

$499 sounds like a decent price at first, but consumers need to be aware that once they add on the basics like a keyboard, monitor and mouse, plus shell out for some antivirus software, the Mac mini price is scraping the ceiling of $1600, hardly a “computer for the rest of us.”

You're going to spend $1200 on a keyboard, mouse and monitor? Gold plated by any chance?

I conclude that if this wasn't a parody, Jorge didn't actually understand the concept of a computer not being Windows-centric and found it hard to come to terms with an OS that didn't need bleach thick anti-virus programs and didn't need a complete OS reinstall every 3 months along with a nice hard disk format.

Don't bother telling me you own a Windows computer and don't need to re-install the OS every 3 months. I'm still waiting for my Windows lap-top to crash.

February 3, 2005 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83423035953ef00d834414c1853ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference I'm a mactard:

Comments

Wow, that guy is amazingly clueless.

Posted by: Manuzhai | Feb 3, 2005 5:33:36 PM

Hmmmmm...I agree with you that he's probably messed that review up just a little.

However, you are incorrect in your assumption that Windows needs to be reinstalled every 3 months: we've moved on from those times, and if you aren't really irresponsibly stupid (i.e. Russian porn sites), you can keep XP running in a stable condition for years :-D

I suppose it is about time I got round to looking into this Mac malarkey :-P

Posted by: Philip Withnall | Feb 3, 2005 5:59:14 PM

I own a Windows computer and I havent needed to re-install the OS in ages.

Partly due to the fact that it is gathering dust in the garage since getting a iMac G5 - but still!

Posted by: Alex | Feb 3, 2005 6:01:47 PM

As soon as I read:

Poor standards compliance: Apple's Safari web browser often fails to render MSN properly

I got a stong sense that the article was meant to be more of a joke. The author even says that IE is in C:\applications - which is wrong since Macs don't use those kinds of slashes in their paths!

Posted by: camzmac | Feb 3, 2005 7:16:06 PM

I'm a Windows user - dabbled in Linux slightly, but my computer's on Windows and always has been. Nothing against Macs, and that guy sounds like he has no clue what he's talking about.

Maybe I really should check out this Mac lark... ;)

Oh, and nice sarcasm levels.

Posted by: James | Feb 3, 2005 7:54:11 PM

It's disgusting that "reviews" like this can be published so easily, it is completely off putting to a consumer perhaps looking at the Mac Mini. They will get completely yhe wrong impression from this. Has this guy ever used a Mac in his life... C:\Applications. I think not.

I have a 9 year old PC right here, Intel processor 266Mhz, 64mb RAM.

Posted by: Phil | Feb 3, 2005 8:20:30 PM

I birst into laughter when I read the THANK GOD!

The thing is, there will be more of these guy's. I bet he is still very young (around 20-ish) and has grown up on a Windows platform.
With windows glasses on and no research and no knowledge about other systems/OS-es you get these kind of articles.

It's gonna get worse.

I use windows and I'm quite happy with it. I like to tease Mac users, but I must admit it is a pretty decent system.

The problem with Windows is, they made it too easy to write software for it. All that visual tooling has a bick drawback. Less skilled programmers are making programs. The result is poorly written software, which just fuck up your computer.

It's like giving a car to a person without a drivers license. He would probably be able to drive it. But would you trust your children with him? I wouldn't.

Posted by: W1lz0r | Feb 3, 2005 9:32:54 PM

I really do hope that article is a joke. If not, I suppose its what you expect from a 20 year old MCSE guy.
Oh well, back to rendering MSN.com badly....

Posted by: Ian | Feb 3, 2005 9:47:33 PM

That was scary. Just goes to prove that freedom of speech is not always a good idea. What's even more scary is that there are people that are equally moronic on the "other side of the fence".

Posted by: Rickard Andersson | Feb 3, 2005 9:50:35 PM

I'm torn between, "Is this guy clueless?" and "Is this a parody article?"

Posted by: Michael Merritt | Feb 4, 2005 12:00:18 AM

I agree that he made a lot of factual mistakes--some glaringly bad--but I also think that he shouldn't be damned for his lack of knowledge, but rather educated. I sent him a rather lengthy review of HIS review, stating the factual issues I noticed, in the hopes that he'd learn from his mistakes. I admit that it's easy to get angry at people who publish things like this without getting things straight, but if he ever reviews another Apple product, it'll be just as erroneous if someone doesn't tell him what he did wrong.

Posted by: Adam Greene | Feb 4, 2005 12:00:30 AM

Here's a couple links to other articles on the site that support the latter question in my last reply;

Article Title: Linux Beat: Building a Linux Desktop for Grandma
http://www.divisiontwo.com/articles/linuxbeat3.htm

Article Title: You've Got Features! -- New version of AOL software coming to a mailbox near you.
http://www.divisiontwo.com/articles/aol1.htm

Gven the obvious nature in the second article I listed, it's now obvious that these things are parodies.

Posted by: Michael Merritt | Feb 4, 2005 12:14:28 AM

Ehm, you did get that his review was ironic... right?

Posted by: Zef Hemel | Feb 4, 2005 8:03:04 AM

Looks like he has taken a lot of people for a ride.

Look at the rest of his writings and it is quite obvious it is a parody.

Posted by: Martin Wallace | Feb 4, 2005 9:58:50 AM

It's so hard to tell these days what's meant to be a parody and what's not. I've read so much stupid stuff (and typed a fair bit myself) that it's never really obvious.

Posted by: Matt | Feb 4, 2005 2:16:51 PM

I've had my PC with WinXP for nearly three years and I've never had to reinstall once. ^_^

It's on every day for anything upto 20 hours, it's never had a virus and I've had 1 BSOD caused by faulty-hardware.

Windows is great!

*goes back to lurking*

Posted by: Kliq | Feb 4, 2005 2:29:47 PM

LMAO fantastic stuff on that site, clearly nothing serious! :p

More LOL @ http://www.google.com/search?q=%22%2Bwww.divisiontwo.%2Bcom/articles/MacMini2.html%22

Posted by: Franklin | Feb 5, 2005 5:56:08 PM

FYI: I haven't had to do one re-installation of my Windows XP Pro, for as long as I can remember. which must be getting on for about 2 years now . . .

Posted by: Mark | Feb 6, 2005 1:44:20 PM

Well im a linux user but im getting a powerbook this summer to prepare for the uni =/
so i hope macs are good as they say :)

Posted by: akurashy | Feb 6, 2005 9:25:28 PM

[QUOTE]Oh, and my PS 2 disks don't play in my xbox - what's that about?[/QUOTE]

LMFAO! That is such a good anomaly.... Where exactly did you read this? I can probably visit there everytime I need a good laugh.

ALso, I have nothing againts macs, but I have never used one, so I couldn't really say where this guy is right or wrong. Oh well, that was a good read :P

Posted by: Jervous | Feb 7, 2005 2:47:51 AM

Matt, let's KICK somebody's ass!

They continue to underestimate the MAC and APPLE revolution: not a human being being slave of a computer with continuous formats, updates, problems but a computer as a loyal and reliable mate to a person.
That's a MAC, ladies and gentlemen.

Just a note: I clearly remind my BRAND NEW (and at that time latest model) Pentium 100 Mhz back in September 1995.

I had ordered it before summer and by September the new 120 Mhz was out.

Not 500 Mhz models then ...


I hope that guy is at least paid for that article ...

Posted by: powergen | Feb 9, 2005 11:18:32 AM

I hate to be pedantic (well, ok, maybe not :))

The pentium 1 only got to 166MHz, as the MMX version it got up to the dizzy heights of 200MHz.

The first pentium II (launched in 97 from memory) was a 233MHz version.

500MHz wasn't reached until 1998/9 and was on the pentium III (with a massive 100MHz bus speed)

:)

Posted by: Stuart | Mar 5, 2005 3:18:45 AM

Post a comment